tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-942059813481083566.post2689329072698996017..comments2023-10-25T07:19:08.019-05:00Comments on The Nosy Gamer: The CSM 9 Summer Summit Minutes: Team SecurityNoizyGamerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17315716516032999133noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-942059813481083566.post-57700824020091741942014-10-31T02:00:12.508-05:002014-10-31T02:00:12.508-05:00I hear that account sharing is a thing. A big thin...I hear that account sharing is a thing. A big thing, according to some, esp for supercaps. Account sharing is against the EULA, but those same "some people" say that enforcement is way down on CCP's priority list. Multi-factor Authentication could result in account sharing being less of a thing. There are probably ways to get around it, but if done at all they should do it correctly - so that getting around it is not easy - or not bother at all.<br /><br />The other side of the coin is if (tinfoil hat mode on) CCP actually condones account sharing and willfully turns a blind eye to it because of :revenue:, then they will never implement Multi-factor Authentication because it would be too good at stopping it.jeuntiquenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-942059813481083566.post-4667920726870895492014-10-30T22:36:20.356-05:002014-10-30T22:36:20.356-05:00I find it odd that EVE doesn't have some multi...I find it odd that EVE doesn't have some multifactor authentication option. When you look at the API access to your character, it always seemed to be far, far ahead of every other game in terms of integration between the game and external systems. Just seems like they would have been one of the first to implement authenticators.David Carsonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-942059813481083566.post-9193467634607218172014-10-30T18:42:02.137-05:002014-10-30T18:42:02.137-05:00The resource drain won't come from tracking it...The resource drain won't come from tracking it so much as from actually banning people. Then you have to handle an increase of people petitioning to have people banned, people fighting the bans, etc.NoizyGamerhttp://nosygamer.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-942059813481083566.post-18889789278491975232014-10-30T10:05:35.598-05:002014-10-30T10:05:35.598-05:00What I found interesting is CCP Peligros answer:
...What I found interesting is CCP Peligros answer: <br />"Stealth bombing lends itself to ISboxing pretty well, and is popular amongst suicide gankers too. ISboxers die a lot, they aren’t elite pvpers."<br />Suicide gankers die a lot. <br />A voice inside my head shouted: "You don't say!?"<br />I went back to the killboards, checking those ISBoxers I know... Replicator, Wrong Target Sorry,... somehow they manage to show 99+% Kill/Loss efficiency. <br />If I use an input broadcasting software to command 20 Catalysts and I suicide gank a Fenrir - of course I will die 20 times while my victim only dies once. Proof made, input broadcasting doesn't give you any advantage but you'll die a lot using it. o_O<br />At least you'll die more often than those you are engaging.<br />It seems to be unimportant that the input broadcaster lost 200m ISK while his victim lost 1.3b ISK + cargo. Most likely this suicide ganker will make a profit or wouldn't engage at all.<br /><br />If an alliance loses 200 battleships while killing 5 enemy titans, would Peligros say: "The enemy team only died 5 times, they win and are elite pvp'ers while the others sucked hard losing 200 ships."<br /><br />He might be an expert in finding bots and RMT and stuff... but now I'm unsure if he played EvE at all?Samsara Toldyanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-942059813481083566.post-80922298514092542522014-10-30T08:55:38.658-05:002014-10-30T08:55:38.658-05:00It is necessary to keep an eye on ISBoxer, because...It is necessary to keep an eye on ISBoxer, because it has the potential to have a significant effect on New Eden.<br /><br />I doubt the resource drain to track it is significant - it is probably automated.Knug Lidinoreply@blogger.com