"Your rigs are two Cargohold Optimizations. If you put anything else there, you will eventually be sorry that you did. Yes, I know, putting Polycarbs or Low Frictions here is awesome. Resist. Sooner or later, you'll need the extra cargo room."I currently have a Low Friction Nozzle Joints and a Polycarbon Engine Housing fit. Back when I did my research on blockade runner fits I read that fitting Cargohold Optimizations was for carebears and would get a ship killed. But since Ripard usually knows what he's talking about, I decided to do a little math.
First, exactly what are the differences in cargo capacity between someone going for maximum align time and someone desiring maximum cargo capacity? The below table shows the cargo capacity a Prowler has when fit with the two rig combinations and the number of Expanded Cargohold IIs.
| Expanded Cargohold II | Low Friction Nozzle Joints/ Polycarbon Engine Housing | 2 x Cargohold Optimization |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4063 | 5373 |
| 1 | 5180 | 6850 |
| 2 | 6604 | 8734 |
The numbers are interesting, but what does that really mean? To compare what the extra cargo capacity costs in terms of align time, I took the data I gathered from all the distribution missions I ran in low sec from 1 May to 13 June, put them in bands by cargo requirements, and came up with the following table.
| Mission Cargo | % of missions | Low Friction Nozzle Joints/ Polycarbon Engine Housing | 2 x Cargohold Optimization |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1-4000 | 35.6% | 3.4 | 3.7 |
| 4800-5000 | 41.6% | 3.7 | 3.7 |
| 5400-6000 | 22.8% | 4.2 | 4.3 |
| 7200-8000 | NA | NA | 5.1 |
Interesting. For 41.6% of the missions I did in low sec, I would have had the same align time if I had used a Prowler fit with Cargohold Optimization rigs as with the more agile combination. That also assumes that I religiously fit for max align times (i.e. fit my ship with the maximum number of Nanofiber Internal Structure IIs every time I dock). I don't. Through experience I learned that I can bust through a gate camp just as well if I have one Expanded Cargohold II fit as if I have nanos in both low slots. I opt for the quickness of getting in and out of the station over getting that .3 second alignment time advantage. With the game evaluating time in one second increments anyway, does that .3 really make a difference? I haven't noticed.
In other words, after doing the math, I really don't experience a difference for 77.2% of the distribution missions I do. The other 22.8%? The difference is 0.1 seconds. Seriously?
The only thing the math shows is that at the higher end, the align times are 5.1. Knocking that under 5 seconds would make a noticeable difference. I could spend the money on a +5 implant, or I could resort to using fleet boosts. I found this in the Evelopedia...
"A Squadron Commander will grant his leadership bonuses to all members of his squadron, including himself."I already do this when I mine and run security missions. Why not distribution missions? Both my main pilots have trained to fly command ships and have Skirmish Warfare trained to V. I just have to set the pilot actually running the mission as the squad commander and the align times look like the table below.
| Mission Cargo | % of missions | Low Friction Nozzle Joints/ Polycarbon Engine Housing | 2 x Cargohold Optimization |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1-4000 | 35.6% | 3.1 | 3.4 |
| 4800-5000 | 41.6% | 3.3 | 3.4 |
| 5400-6000 | 22.8% | 3.8 | 3.9 |
| 7200-8000 | NA | NA | 4.6 |
Sub 4 second align times on all the distribution missions I currently run and under 5 seconds when doing the larger missions. Not bad. I should add in the benefits when doing the storyline mission "Materials for War". At level 4, the ore required takes up 9600m3 of space. I have to make two trips in my current configuration. With a maximum cargo capacity setup and using Giant Secure Containers, I can reduce that down to one.
EDIT: This only works if you have another pilot in system. But nice for dual-boxing or in a fleet.
I have two Medium Cargohold Optimization Is building now and can update my ship the next time I log in. I really can't argue with math.
